I have just received an e-mail stating that the MNDA is short of finances, and have asked branches to think twice about helping those with MND with this winters fuel costs. The e-mail also states that new rules governing branch expenditure can be expected early next year (2013).
Since the MNDA are saying they are so short on funds with reserves for only two or three months (the Charities Commission recommend minimum reserves of 6 to 9 months), is it not time for all executive officers to give back the large salary increases paid to them between 2009 and 2010. This, I must point out, was the time when there was a large decrease in the Associations income.
The Association is only classed as a medium size charity by British standards, therefore I ask, is it right for our Association to continue providing one fifth of all money given to research throughout the world to find a cure for MND, and should it still provide all the funds to hold the International Symposium in different countries every year?
Given that the Association is trying to force Government agencies to provide the equipment we need, should they not be bringing pressure to bear on the Government, who I understand is responsible for funding medical research.
I call upon the MND Association to come clean over these issues, and tell us the truth about their intentions.
CB.
Since the MNDA are saying they are so short on funds with reserves for only two or three months (the Charities Commission recommend minimum reserves of 6 to 9 months), is it not time for all executive officers to give back the large salary increases paid to them between 2009 and 2010. This, I must point out, was the time when there was a large decrease in the Associations income.
The Association is only classed as a medium size charity by British standards, therefore I ask, is it right for our Association to continue providing one fifth of all money given to research throughout the world to find a cure for MND, and should it still provide all the funds to hold the International Symposium in different countries every year?
Given that the Association is trying to force Government agencies to provide the equipment we need, should they not be bringing pressure to bear on the Government, who I understand is responsible for funding medical research.
I call upon the MND Association to come clean over these issues, and tell us the truth about their intentions.
CB.
Comment