"Defamatory remarks according to the dictionary are false or unjust remarks. Perhaps you would care to explain which remarks are false or unjust or perhaps your interpretation of the rule is simply that you have the right to silence anyone who criticises the association whether their criticism is false or unjust or not?
If that is the case it seems you ought to clarify your rule with a word other than "defamatory".
If you are going to remove Graham's posts on the grounds that they are defamatory could you explain how they are false or unjust. It seems to me you seek to remove them on the grounds that they are embarrassing to the mnda and demonstrate your failure to support him at his time of greatest need.
You have been asked to justify your abysmal failure to come to his aid and explain why you did nothing to stop the long term abuse he suffered at the hands of the * nurses but rather than come forward and provide answers you seek to remove the criticism. Shame on you. To say others are complaining about the content of this thread seems to be another attempt to shift responsibility. The answer to end all this is to reply carefully to each point . Say what you did or did not do and why you did or did not do it.
Easy , problem goes away and we all move on. If you do this everybody is satisfied. If you fail to do this then everyone sees that you failed Graham when he needed you most and they will draw their own conclusions.
You underestimate the magnitude of what you are attempting to sweep under the carpet here. Time to face up to what you have or haven't done and explain what you intend to do to ensure no other mnd patient has a similar experience in a uk hospital.
John
If that is the case it seems you ought to clarify your rule with a word other than "defamatory".
If you are going to remove Graham's posts on the grounds that they are defamatory could you explain how they are false or unjust. It seems to me you seek to remove them on the grounds that they are embarrassing to the mnda and demonstrate your failure to support him at his time of greatest need.
You have been asked to justify your abysmal failure to come to his aid and explain why you did nothing to stop the long term abuse he suffered at the hands of the * nurses but rather than come forward and provide answers you seek to remove the criticism. Shame on you. To say others are complaining about the content of this thread seems to be another attempt to shift responsibility. The answer to end all this is to reply carefully to each point . Say what you did or did not do and why you did or did not do it.
Easy , problem goes away and we all move on. If you do this everybody is satisfied. If you fail to do this then everyone sees that you failed Graham when he needed you most and they will draw their own conclusions.
You underestimate the magnitude of what you are attempting to sweep under the carpet here. Time to face up to what you have or haven't done and explain what you intend to do to ensure no other mnd patient has a similar experience in a uk hospital.
John
Comment